Extending classes having recursive (circular) relationshipsHi, I have the following object-oriented data structure for holding file and folder data in memory. It’s used by a number of existing applications, and I do not want to have to modify them by changing the data structure directly for the sake of a new application that requires some extensions. types of TFolderCpt= class; TFolderCptArray= selection of TFolderCpt; TFolder= class; TFolderCpt= group
I 'm just discovering a difference between the two tools : - PowerAMC (generally used for french users - often used to practice Merise methodology) and - PowerDesigner (generally used by english users) This difference is:PowerDesigner doesn't authorise a N-N relationship (personne <<--- year_diploma_obtention--->> diploma ) to have a attribute contrary PowerAMC. Consequently, when a user of PowerDesigner want to add an attribute to a relationship, he have to transform the relationship in entity. Then two so.
A lot more Tips
Recursive DWIl s'agit d'un content multivolet bien au structure MIME. --------------B5B2D2CBBB6FECAF74D02B86 Posts-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Articles-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We produced a set of datawindows organized like this : DW1 composed of several nested DW |---- a label |---- DW step one (We made new mother DW1 calling in itself from the exporting the reason code and you can switching the name of one's nested DW) |---- DW 2 ( a no further recursive DW that delivers the content of newest level) Ok, it truly does work. We citation arguments so you can DW1 and it also generate my personal tree design.
PowerDesigner produce age group and you can relationships on element of top secret. Let!Good morning All the! This new specialist to your macrolanguage PowerDesigner - this matter for your requirements! We have an issue with the newest age group of trigger (system is generated to own MS SQL 6.5). When the column, getting used in international secret is within the in an identical way region out of number one secret and that column succeed NULL worth, PowerDesigner stimulates needed flingster beoordeling look for parental dining tables in the event the update(SectionID) or update(DocTypeID) initiate get a hold of = (find count(*) out of entered where SectionID is null and you may DocT.
GeneralIn sybase to the line what datatype this new sybase expert's suggest both char otherwise varchar? We heared you to while creating posting statistics . the varchar try costlier compared to the place occupied of the char. Please show your knowledge. Thanks and best Relation Gopi Chand T. The possibility ranging from "varchar" and you may "char" does not have any a lot of almost anything to carry out towards overall performance away from "upgrade statistics" which i discover of. There is certainly a small efficiency punishment to possess accessing varying size study into row, it create just be famous around high stream. Grab a good.
GeneralSir/Madam, Please Explain the following 1. It is possible to set modify cover up for each and every row 2. Whether it is it is possible to to obtain the column identity 1. There is absolutely no improvement in the new column (Edit changed or ItemChanged Experience cannot flame in such a case) step 3. For the PFC U_Tvs as soon as we I so you're able to modify the fresh new datastore that has been registered I am having the error stability solution. This is because for the U_Television he or she is rowscopying the latest retrived worthy of off a keen attrib to help you that it datastore, therefore the updates is newmodified!. I would like to enhance this new datastore by modifying brand new position as datamodified!. Suppo.
A common table expression (CTE) was a called temporary result lay one to is obtainable for the scope of one declaration and that can end up being referred to afterwards inside you to definitely report, possibly several times. The following discussion identifies how-to generate comments which use CTEs.
Well-known Desk Expressions
To establish common desk terms, have fun with a through condition that one or more comma-split up subclauses. Each subclause provides a good subquery that makes a result put, and you may partners a name on subquery. The second analogy represent CTEs titled cte1 and you may cte2 about With clause, and you will means him or her on the better-top Get a hold of you to definitely comes after the latest Which have clause:
